The meat paradox: how are we able to love animals and love eating animals?

Steve Loughnan, Boyka Bratanova, Elisa Puvia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The relationship between people and animals is morally complex. This complexity stems from our ambivalent treatment of animals and is nowhere better captured than in the consumption of meat. Meat eating is morally problematic because it contrasts our desire to avoid hurting animals with our appetite for their flesh. This tension – to love animals and to love meat – is the essence of the meat paradox.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-18
Number of pages4
JournalIn Mind
Volume1
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

ingestion
meat
animals
meat consumption
appetite
stems

Cite this

Loughnan, S., Bratanova, B., & Puvia, E. (2012). The meat paradox: how are we able to love animals and love eating animals? In Mind, 1, 15-18.
Loughnan, Steve ; Bratanova, Boyka ; Puvia, Elisa. / The meat paradox : how are we able to love animals and love eating animals?. In: In Mind. 2012 ; Vol. 1. pp. 15-18.
@article{35bd4f54365f435b8b3deed173bee4ff,
title = "The meat paradox: how are we able to love animals and love eating animals?",
abstract = "The relationship between people and animals is morally complex. This complexity stems from our ambivalent treatment of animals and is nowhere better captured than in the consumption of meat. Meat eating is morally problematic because it contrasts our desire to avoid hurting animals with our appetite for their flesh. This tension – to love animals and to love meat – is the essence of the meat paradox.",
author = "Steve Loughnan and Boyka Bratanova and Elisa Puvia",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "15--18",
journal = "In Mind",
issn = "2240-2454",

}

Loughnan, S, Bratanova, B & Puvia, E 2012, 'The meat paradox: how are we able to love animals and love eating animals?', In Mind, vol. 1, pp. 15-18.

The meat paradox : how are we able to love animals and love eating animals? / Loughnan, Steve; Bratanova, Boyka; Puvia, Elisa.

In: In Mind, Vol. 1, 2012, p. 15-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The meat paradox

T2 - how are we able to love animals and love eating animals?

AU - Loughnan, Steve

AU - Bratanova, Boyka

AU - Puvia, Elisa

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The relationship between people and animals is morally complex. This complexity stems from our ambivalent treatment of animals and is nowhere better captured than in the consumption of meat. Meat eating is morally problematic because it contrasts our desire to avoid hurting animals with our appetite for their flesh. This tension – to love animals and to love meat – is the essence of the meat paradox.

AB - The relationship between people and animals is morally complex. This complexity stems from our ambivalent treatment of animals and is nowhere better captured than in the consumption of meat. Meat eating is morally problematic because it contrasts our desire to avoid hurting animals with our appetite for their flesh. This tension – to love animals and to love meat – is the essence of the meat paradox.

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 15

EP - 18

JO - In Mind

JF - In Mind

SN - 2240-2454

ER -