The rise and demise of participative management in Algeria

Mohamed Branine*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper evaluates the development and subsequent outcome of the Algerian experience of participative management. In Algeria, participation was seen as an important determinant in the country's socioeconomic development and was constituted under conditions of hope to blend the ideology of the state with the existing social structure through centralized and bureaucratic planning. However, the outcome was not as expected, either by the state, workers or managers. It has been a disappointing experience for all. It is argued here that the failure of participative management in Algeria is the result of introducing views and ideologies alien to the predominant norms and cultural values. Some of the studies that have attempted to explain the outcome of the Algerian experience are presented and criticized, and an alternative explanation is offered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)595-630
Number of pages36
JournalEconomic and Industrial Democracy
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 1994

Fingerprint

Managers
Planning
Ideology
Participative management
Algeria
Social structure
Blends
Socio-economic development
Cultural values
Participation
Workers

Cite this

@article{f71a71ca91e6416c9dfdef9793a4f6f2,
title = "The rise and demise of participative management in Algeria",
abstract = "This paper evaluates the development and subsequent outcome of the Algerian experience of participative management. In Algeria, participation was seen as an important determinant in the country's socioeconomic development and was constituted under conditions of hope to blend the ideology of the state with the existing social structure through centralized and bureaucratic planning. However, the outcome was not as expected, either by the state, workers or managers. It has been a disappointing experience for all. It is argued here that the failure of participative management in Algeria is the result of introducing views and ideologies alien to the predominant norms and cultural values. Some of the studies that have attempted to explain the outcome of the Algerian experience are presented and criticized, and an alternative explanation is offered.",
author = "Mohamed Branine",
year = "1994",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0143831X94154005",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "595--630",
journal = "Economic and Industrial Democracy",
issn = "0143-831X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

The rise and demise of participative management in Algeria. / Branine, Mohamed.

In: Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.11.1994, p. 595-630.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rise and demise of participative management in Algeria

AU - Branine, Mohamed

PY - 1994/11/1

Y1 - 1994/11/1

N2 - This paper evaluates the development and subsequent outcome of the Algerian experience of participative management. In Algeria, participation was seen as an important determinant in the country's socioeconomic development and was constituted under conditions of hope to blend the ideology of the state with the existing social structure through centralized and bureaucratic planning. However, the outcome was not as expected, either by the state, workers or managers. It has been a disappointing experience for all. It is argued here that the failure of participative management in Algeria is the result of introducing views and ideologies alien to the predominant norms and cultural values. Some of the studies that have attempted to explain the outcome of the Algerian experience are presented and criticized, and an alternative explanation is offered.

AB - This paper evaluates the development and subsequent outcome of the Algerian experience of participative management. In Algeria, participation was seen as an important determinant in the country's socioeconomic development and was constituted under conditions of hope to blend the ideology of the state with the existing social structure through centralized and bureaucratic planning. However, the outcome was not as expected, either by the state, workers or managers. It has been a disappointing experience for all. It is argued here that the failure of participative management in Algeria is the result of introducing views and ideologies alien to the predominant norms and cultural values. Some of the studies that have attempted to explain the outcome of the Algerian experience are presented and criticized, and an alternative explanation is offered.

U2 - 10.1177/0143831X94154005

DO - 10.1177/0143831X94154005

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 595

EP - 630

JO - Economic and Industrial Democracy

JF - Economic and Industrial Democracy

SN - 0143-831X

IS - 4

ER -