The rise of legal pragmatism in English contract law

Alan Barron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Writing extra-judicially in an article published in 1996 Lord Steyn asked whether legal formalism held sway in English law.1 Although he considered this question from a broad perspective, looking at a number of areas of law, he also considered the question in relation to the law of contract. Drawing on his Lordship’s comments, both judicial and extra-judicial, this article seeks to demonstrate a clear change in judicial approaches to decision-making which signals a move away from formalistic interpretative techniques towards an approach very much akin to the legal pragmatism developed by Judge Richard Posner in the United States. However, the limits to the development of that approach will be demonstrated with reference to a comparison between judicial and academic conceptions of reasonable expectations in contract.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-221
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Contract Law
Volume22
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

law of obligations
pragmatism
decision making
Law

Cite this

Barron, Alan. / The rise of legal pragmatism in English contract law. In: Journal of Contract Law. 2006 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 199-221.
@article{ffa2d384bb3a4591bb288e0efea0aa04,
title = "The rise of legal pragmatism in English contract law",
abstract = "Writing extra-judicially in an article published in 1996 Lord Steyn asked whether legal formalism held sway in English law.1 Although he considered this question from a broad perspective, looking at a number of areas of law, he also considered the question in relation to the law of contract. Drawing on his Lordship’s comments, both judicial and extra-judicial, this article seeks to demonstrate a clear change in judicial approaches to decision-making which signals a move away from formalistic interpretative techniques towards an approach very much akin to the legal pragmatism developed by Judge Richard Posner in the United States. However, the limits to the development of that approach will be demonstrated with reference to a comparison between judicial and academic conceptions of reasonable expectations in contract.",
author = "Alan Barron",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "199--221",
journal = "Journal of Contract Law",
issn = "1030-7230",
number = "3",

}

Barron, A 2006, 'The rise of legal pragmatism in English contract law', Journal of Contract Law, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 199-221.

The rise of legal pragmatism in English contract law. / Barron, Alan.

In: Journal of Contract Law, Vol. 22, No. 3, 11.2006, p. 199-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rise of legal pragmatism in English contract law

AU - Barron, Alan

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - Writing extra-judicially in an article published in 1996 Lord Steyn asked whether legal formalism held sway in English law.1 Although he considered this question from a broad perspective, looking at a number of areas of law, he also considered the question in relation to the law of contract. Drawing on his Lordship’s comments, both judicial and extra-judicial, this article seeks to demonstrate a clear change in judicial approaches to decision-making which signals a move away from formalistic interpretative techniques towards an approach very much akin to the legal pragmatism developed by Judge Richard Posner in the United States. However, the limits to the development of that approach will be demonstrated with reference to a comparison between judicial and academic conceptions of reasonable expectations in contract.

AB - Writing extra-judicially in an article published in 1996 Lord Steyn asked whether legal formalism held sway in English law.1 Although he considered this question from a broad perspective, looking at a number of areas of law, he also considered the question in relation to the law of contract. Drawing on his Lordship’s comments, both judicial and extra-judicial, this article seeks to demonstrate a clear change in judicial approaches to decision-making which signals a move away from formalistic interpretative techniques towards an approach very much akin to the legal pragmatism developed by Judge Richard Posner in the United States. However, the limits to the development of that approach will be demonstrated with reference to a comparison between judicial and academic conceptions of reasonable expectations in contract.

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 199

EP - 221

JO - Journal of Contract Law

JF - Journal of Contract Law

SN - 1030-7230

IS - 3

ER -