Thinking beyond the hybrid: “actually-existing” cities “after neoliberalism” in Boyle et al.

Alex Law, Gerry Mooney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In their article, ‘The spatialities of actually existing neoliberalism in Glasgow, 1977 to present’, Mark Boyle, Christopher McWilliams and Gareth Rice (2008) usefully problematise our current understanding of neoliberal urbanism. Our response is aimed at developing a sympathetic but critical approach to Boyle et al's understanding of neoliberal urbanism as illustrated by the Glasgow example. In particular, the counterposing by Boyle et al of a 'hybrid, mutant' model to a 'pure' model of neoliberalism for us misrepresents existing models of neoliberalism as a perfectly finished object rather than a roughly mottled process. That they do not identify any ‘pure’ model leads them to create a straw construct against which they can claim a more sophisticated, refined approach to the messiness of neoliberal urbanism. In contrast, we view neoliberalism as a contested and unstable response to accumulation crises at various scales of analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-294
Number of pages6
JournalGeografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography
Volume91
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

neoliberalism
present

Cite this

@article{f2eb19b118d841f58b18d9338c352ca7,
title = "Thinking beyond the hybrid: “actually-existing” cities “after neoliberalism” in Boyle et al.",
abstract = "In their article, ‘The spatialities of actually existing neoliberalism in Glasgow, 1977 to present’, Mark Boyle, Christopher McWilliams and Gareth Rice (2008) usefully problematise our current understanding of neoliberal urbanism. Our response is aimed at developing a sympathetic but critical approach to Boyle et al's understanding of neoliberal urbanism as illustrated by the Glasgow example. In particular, the counterposing by Boyle et al of a 'hybrid, mutant' model to a 'pure' model of neoliberalism for us misrepresents existing models of neoliberalism as a perfectly finished object rather than a roughly mottled process. That they do not identify any ‘pure’ model leads them to create a straw construct against which they can claim a more sophisticated, refined approach to the messiness of neoliberal urbanism. In contrast, we view neoliberalism as a contested and unstable response to accumulation crises at various scales of analysis.",
author = "Alex Law and Gerry Mooney",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-0467.2009.00321.x",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "289--294",
journal = "Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography",
issn = "0435-3684",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Thinking beyond the hybrid : “actually-existing” cities “after neoliberalism” in Boyle et al.. / Law, Alex; Mooney, Gerry.

In: Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, Vol. 91, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 289-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thinking beyond the hybrid

T2 - “actually-existing” cities “after neoliberalism” in Boyle et al.

AU - Law, Alex

AU - Mooney, Gerry

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - In their article, ‘The spatialities of actually existing neoliberalism in Glasgow, 1977 to present’, Mark Boyle, Christopher McWilliams and Gareth Rice (2008) usefully problematise our current understanding of neoliberal urbanism. Our response is aimed at developing a sympathetic but critical approach to Boyle et al's understanding of neoliberal urbanism as illustrated by the Glasgow example. In particular, the counterposing by Boyle et al of a 'hybrid, mutant' model to a 'pure' model of neoliberalism for us misrepresents existing models of neoliberalism as a perfectly finished object rather than a roughly mottled process. That they do not identify any ‘pure’ model leads them to create a straw construct against which they can claim a more sophisticated, refined approach to the messiness of neoliberal urbanism. In contrast, we view neoliberalism as a contested and unstable response to accumulation crises at various scales of analysis.

AB - In their article, ‘The spatialities of actually existing neoliberalism in Glasgow, 1977 to present’, Mark Boyle, Christopher McWilliams and Gareth Rice (2008) usefully problematise our current understanding of neoliberal urbanism. Our response is aimed at developing a sympathetic but critical approach to Boyle et al's understanding of neoliberal urbanism as illustrated by the Glasgow example. In particular, the counterposing by Boyle et al of a 'hybrid, mutant' model to a 'pure' model of neoliberalism for us misrepresents existing models of neoliberalism as a perfectly finished object rather than a roughly mottled process. That they do not identify any ‘pure’ model leads them to create a straw construct against which they can claim a more sophisticated, refined approach to the messiness of neoliberal urbanism. In contrast, we view neoliberalism as a contested and unstable response to accumulation crises at various scales of analysis.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2009.00321.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2009.00321.x

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 289

EP - 294

JO - Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography

JF - Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography

SN - 0435-3684

IS - 3

ER -