Time to address the double inequality of differences in dietary intake between Scotland and England

Karen L. Barton, Stephanie Chambers, Annie S. Anderson, Wendy L. Wrieden

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    59 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Geographical disparities in health outcomes have been evident across the UK for decades. There is limited recent analysis on the dietary differences between Scotland and England that might go some way to explain these health differences. This study aimed to assess whether, and to what degree, aspects of diet and nutrition differ between Scottish and English populations, specifically between those with similar household incomes. Twelve years of UK food purchase data (2001-2012) were pooled and used to estimate household level consumption data for Scotland and England. Population mean food consumption and nutrient intakes were estimated, adjusting for known confounders (year, age of household reference person, age they left full-time education and income). Comparison was also made within equivalised income quintiles. Analysis showed that the foods and nutrients that should be increased in the diet (highlighted in the Scottish Dietary Goals) were lower in Scotland than England (e.g. fruit and vegetables 267g/day (99%CI 259-274g/day) vs. 298g/day (99%CI 296-301g/day), P<0.001). Likewise, foods and drinks linked with poor health outcomes were higher in Scotland. These regional inequalities in diet were even more pronounced in the lower income groups (e.g. red and processed meat consumption in the lowest income quintile was 65g/day (99% CI 61-69g/day) in Scotland vs. 58g/day (99% CI 57-60g/day) in England, P<0.001, but similar in the highest income quintile (58g/day (99%CI 54-61 g/day) vs. 59g/day (99% CI 58-60 g/day) respectively). A poorer diet in Scotland compared to England, particularly among disadvantaged groups, may contribute to differences in excess mortality between countries.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)220-226
    Number of pages7
    JournalBritish Journal of Nutrition
    Volume120
    Issue number2
    Early online date27 Jun 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 28 Jul 2018

    Fingerprint

    Scotland
    England
    Food
    Diet
    Health
    Food Analysis
    Vulnerable Populations
    Vegetables
    Population
    Fruit
    Economics
    Education
    Mortality

    Cite this

    Barton, Karen L. ; Chambers, Stephanie ; Anderson, Annie S. ; Wrieden, Wendy L. / Time to address the double inequality of differences in dietary intake between Scotland and England. In: British Journal of Nutrition. 2018 ; Vol. 120, No. 2. pp. 220-226.
    @article{4da0127596f94e578f37a1e5e2f99e95,
    title = "Time to address the double inequality of differences in dietary intake between Scotland and England",
    abstract = "Geographical disparities in health outcomes have been evident across the UK for decades. There is limited recent analysis on the dietary differences between Scotland and England that might go some way to explain these health differences. This study aimed to assess whether, and to what degree, aspects of diet and nutrition differ between Scottish and English populations, specifically between those with similar household incomes. Twelve years of UK food purchase data (2001-2012) were pooled and used to estimate household level consumption data for Scotland and England. Population mean food consumption and nutrient intakes were estimated, adjusting for known confounders (year, age of household reference person, age they left full-time education and income). Comparison was also made within equivalised income quintiles. Analysis showed that the foods and nutrients that should be increased in the diet (highlighted in the Scottish Dietary Goals) were lower in Scotland than England (e.g. fruit and vegetables 267g/day (99{\%}CI 259-274g/day) vs. 298g/day (99{\%}CI 296-301g/day), P<0.001). Likewise, foods and drinks linked with poor health outcomes were higher in Scotland. These regional inequalities in diet were even more pronounced in the lower income groups (e.g. red and processed meat consumption in the lowest income quintile was 65g/day (99{\%} CI 61-69g/day) in Scotland vs. 58g/day (99{\%} CI 57-60g/day) in England, P<0.001, but similar in the highest income quintile (58g/day (99{\%}CI 54-61 g/day) vs. 59g/day (99{\%} CI 58-60 g/day) respectively). A poorer diet in Scotland compared to England, particularly among disadvantaged groups, may contribute to differences in excess mortality between countries.",
    author = "Barton, {Karen L.} and Stephanie Chambers and Anderson, {Annie S.} and Wrieden, {Wendy L.}",
    year = "2018",
    month = "7",
    day = "28",
    doi = "10.1017/S0007114518001435",
    language = "English",
    volume = "120",
    pages = "220--226",
    journal = "British Journal of Nutrition",
    issn = "0007-1145",
    publisher = "CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS",
    number = "2",

    }

    Time to address the double inequality of differences in dietary intake between Scotland and England. / Barton, Karen L.; Chambers, Stephanie; Anderson, Annie S.; Wrieden, Wendy L.

    In: British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 120, No. 2, 28.07.2018, p. 220-226.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Time to address the double inequality of differences in dietary intake between Scotland and England

    AU - Barton, Karen L.

    AU - Chambers, Stephanie

    AU - Anderson, Annie S.

    AU - Wrieden, Wendy L.

    PY - 2018/7/28

    Y1 - 2018/7/28

    N2 - Geographical disparities in health outcomes have been evident across the UK for decades. There is limited recent analysis on the dietary differences between Scotland and England that might go some way to explain these health differences. This study aimed to assess whether, and to what degree, aspects of diet and nutrition differ between Scottish and English populations, specifically between those with similar household incomes. Twelve years of UK food purchase data (2001-2012) were pooled and used to estimate household level consumption data for Scotland and England. Population mean food consumption and nutrient intakes were estimated, adjusting for known confounders (year, age of household reference person, age they left full-time education and income). Comparison was also made within equivalised income quintiles. Analysis showed that the foods and nutrients that should be increased in the diet (highlighted in the Scottish Dietary Goals) were lower in Scotland than England (e.g. fruit and vegetables 267g/day (99%CI 259-274g/day) vs. 298g/day (99%CI 296-301g/day), P<0.001). Likewise, foods and drinks linked with poor health outcomes were higher in Scotland. These regional inequalities in diet were even more pronounced in the lower income groups (e.g. red and processed meat consumption in the lowest income quintile was 65g/day (99% CI 61-69g/day) in Scotland vs. 58g/day (99% CI 57-60g/day) in England, P<0.001, but similar in the highest income quintile (58g/day (99%CI 54-61 g/day) vs. 59g/day (99% CI 58-60 g/day) respectively). A poorer diet in Scotland compared to England, particularly among disadvantaged groups, may contribute to differences in excess mortality between countries.

    AB - Geographical disparities in health outcomes have been evident across the UK for decades. There is limited recent analysis on the dietary differences between Scotland and England that might go some way to explain these health differences. This study aimed to assess whether, and to what degree, aspects of diet and nutrition differ between Scottish and English populations, specifically between those with similar household incomes. Twelve years of UK food purchase data (2001-2012) were pooled and used to estimate household level consumption data for Scotland and England. Population mean food consumption and nutrient intakes were estimated, adjusting for known confounders (year, age of household reference person, age they left full-time education and income). Comparison was also made within equivalised income quintiles. Analysis showed that the foods and nutrients that should be increased in the diet (highlighted in the Scottish Dietary Goals) were lower in Scotland than England (e.g. fruit and vegetables 267g/day (99%CI 259-274g/day) vs. 298g/day (99%CI 296-301g/day), P<0.001). Likewise, foods and drinks linked with poor health outcomes were higher in Scotland. These regional inequalities in diet were even more pronounced in the lower income groups (e.g. red and processed meat consumption in the lowest income quintile was 65g/day (99% CI 61-69g/day) in Scotland vs. 58g/day (99% CI 57-60g/day) in England, P<0.001, but similar in the highest income quintile (58g/day (99%CI 54-61 g/day) vs. 59g/day (99% CI 58-60 g/day) respectively). A poorer diet in Scotland compared to England, particularly among disadvantaged groups, may contribute to differences in excess mortality between countries.

    U2 - 10.1017/S0007114518001435

    DO - 10.1017/S0007114518001435

    M3 - Article

    VL - 120

    SP - 220

    EP - 226

    JO - British Journal of Nutrition

    JF - British Journal of Nutrition

    SN - 0007-1145

    IS - 2

    ER -