Tubal sterilization, all-cause death, and cancer among women in the United Kingdom

evidence from the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study

Lisa Iversen, Philip C Hannaford, Alison M Elliott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between tubal sterilization and subsequent all-cause death and the risk of any gynecologic and breast cancer in women in the United Kingdom.

STUDY DESIGN: A cohort study was conducted with 2801 sterilized women and 2801 nonsterilized women who were identified from the UK Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study. Adjusted hazard ratios and 95% CIs were calculated with Cox regression.

RESULTS: Tubal sterilization was not associated with significantly altered risks of subsequent all-cause death or cancer. Tubal sterilization was associated with a nonsignificant reduced risk of subsequent gynecologic (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.52-1.37) and breast cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.67-1.16).

CONCLUSION: The absence of increased long-term death and cancer risk is reassuring, given that many women have chosen this method of contraception.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)447 e1-447 e8
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume196
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tubal Sterilization
Contraception
General Practitioners
Cause of Death
Neoplasms
Breast Neoplasms
Cohort Studies
United Kingdom

Cite this

@article{e491b509b5864afb809e3dcecdcad9b6,
title = "Tubal sterilization, all-cause death, and cancer among women in the United Kingdom: evidence from the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between tubal sterilization and subsequent all-cause death and the risk of any gynecologic and breast cancer in women in the United Kingdom.STUDY DESIGN: A cohort study was conducted with 2801 sterilized women and 2801 nonsterilized women who were identified from the UK Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study. Adjusted hazard ratios and 95{\%} CIs were calculated with Cox regression.RESULTS: Tubal sterilization was not associated with significantly altered risks of subsequent all-cause death or cancer. Tubal sterilization was associated with a nonsignificant reduced risk of subsequent gynecologic (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84; 95{\%} CI, 0.52-1.37) and breast cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88; 95{\%} CI, 0.67-1.16).CONCLUSION: The absence of increased long-term death and cancer risk is reassuring, given that many women have chosen this method of contraception.",
author = "Lisa Iversen and Hannaford, {Philip C} and Elliott, {Alison M}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2007.01.022",
language = "English",
volume = "196",
pages = "447 e1--447 e8",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tubal sterilization, all-cause death, and cancer among women in the United Kingdom

T2 - evidence from the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study

AU - Iversen, Lisa

AU - Hannaford, Philip C

AU - Elliott, Alison M

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between tubal sterilization and subsequent all-cause death and the risk of any gynecologic and breast cancer in women in the United Kingdom.STUDY DESIGN: A cohort study was conducted with 2801 sterilized women and 2801 nonsterilized women who were identified from the UK Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study. Adjusted hazard ratios and 95% CIs were calculated with Cox regression.RESULTS: Tubal sterilization was not associated with significantly altered risks of subsequent all-cause death or cancer. Tubal sterilization was associated with a nonsignificant reduced risk of subsequent gynecologic (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.52-1.37) and breast cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.67-1.16).CONCLUSION: The absence of increased long-term death and cancer risk is reassuring, given that many women have chosen this method of contraception.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between tubal sterilization and subsequent all-cause death and the risk of any gynecologic and breast cancer in women in the United Kingdom.STUDY DESIGN: A cohort study was conducted with 2801 sterilized women and 2801 nonsterilized women who were identified from the UK Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study. Adjusted hazard ratios and 95% CIs were calculated with Cox regression.RESULTS: Tubal sterilization was not associated with significantly altered risks of subsequent all-cause death or cancer. Tubal sterilization was associated with a nonsignificant reduced risk of subsequent gynecologic (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.52-1.37) and breast cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.67-1.16).CONCLUSION: The absence of increased long-term death and cancer risk is reassuring, given that many women have chosen this method of contraception.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.01.022

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.01.022

M3 - Article

VL - 196

SP - 447 e1-447 e8

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 5

ER -