Abstract
This study has analysed the suite of response options available to decision makers in terms of their robustness to present and future change. To achieve this it developed a stress-testing approach to assess the consequences for natural capital and resultant ecosystem services when response options are evaluated against major drivers of change. The UK NEA scenarios were used to contextualise future drivers of socioeconomic change, with additional compound effects due to climate change. After testing the current suite of response options, implications are considered for future policy design. The role of complementary initiatives can be enhanced by reference to conceptual frameworks (4Es; 4 Is) that link to human behaviours and motives for action.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publisher | UNEP-WCMC |
| Number of pages | 177 |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Response options
- Decision makers
- Present and future change
- Ecosystem services
- UK NEA scenarios
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'UK national ecosystem assessment follow-on: work package report 8: robust response options: what response options might be used to improve policy and practice for the sustainable delivery of ecosystem services?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver