“Unintentional demarketing” in higher education

Nnamdi O. Madichie*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

There have been so many abortive efforts to increase demand, resulting actually in driving customers away – this epitomizes “demarketing” and it is, by all means, “unintentional”. This chapter presents the developments in a sector where the consequences of such “unintentional demarketing” have often been overlooked. It highlights the “demarketing” consequences that were not envisaged by the HEI sector, which according to Levy, equates to “marketing myopia” arising from the unintentional demarketing initiatives by those institutions that should have known better. In their bid to embark upon ostensible demarketing (or sometimes strategic demarketing), HEIs have only ended up “cannibalizing” their flagship brands and/or services. Typical examples considered in this chapter include (i) the rampant revised editions of best-selling textbooks with very little value-added; (ii) polycentric misunderstanding of regionally adapted texts in order to appeal to erroneously perceived new frontiers (e.g. Asia and the Middle East); and (iii) the launch of inappropriate programmes and/or courses, which are little more than “a flash in the pan”with no sustainable basis for achieving medium-to long-term goals.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDemarketing
EditorsNigel Bradley, Jim Blythe
Place of PublicationAbingdon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter13
Pages198-211
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9780203591208
ISBN (Print)9780415816472, 9780415816489
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Oct 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

value added
selling
Middle East
edition
textbook
appeal
education
marketing
customer
demand

Cite this

Madichie, N. O. (2013). “Unintentional demarketing” in higher education. In N. Bradley, & J. Blythe (Eds.), Demarketing (pp. 198-211). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203591208
Madichie, Nnamdi O. / “Unintentional demarketing” in higher education. Demarketing. editor / Nigel Bradley ; Jim Blythe. Abingdon : Routledge, 2013. pp. 198-211
@inbook{1c16bdfc549e4082a2b5e3b70ccdc44f,
title = "“Unintentional demarketing” in higher education",
abstract = "There have been so many abortive efforts to increase demand, resulting actually in driving customers away – this epitomizes “demarketing” and it is, by all means, “unintentional”. This chapter presents the developments in a sector where the consequences of such “unintentional demarketing” have often been overlooked. It highlights the “demarketing” consequences that were not envisaged by the HEI sector, which according to Levy, equates to “marketing myopia” arising from the unintentional demarketing initiatives by those institutions that should have known better. In their bid to embark upon ostensible demarketing (or sometimes strategic demarketing), HEIs have only ended up “cannibalizing” their flagship brands and/or services. Typical examples considered in this chapter include (i) the rampant revised editions of best-selling textbooks with very little value-added; (ii) polycentric misunderstanding of regionally adapted texts in order to appeal to erroneously perceived new frontiers (e.g. Asia and the Middle East); and (iii) the launch of inappropriate programmes and/or courses, which are little more than “a flash in the pan”with no sustainable basis for achieving medium-to long-term goals.",
author = "Madichie, {Nnamdi O.}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "23",
doi = "10.4324/9780203591208",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780415816472",
pages = "198--211",
editor = "Nigel Bradley and Jim Blythe",
booktitle = "Demarketing",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Madichie, NO 2013, “Unintentional demarketing” in higher education. in N Bradley & J Blythe (eds), Demarketing. Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 198-211. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203591208

“Unintentional demarketing” in higher education. / Madichie, Nnamdi O.

Demarketing. ed. / Nigel Bradley; Jim Blythe. Abingdon : Routledge, 2013. p. 198-211.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - “Unintentional demarketing” in higher education

AU - Madichie, Nnamdi O.

PY - 2013/10/23

Y1 - 2013/10/23

N2 - There have been so many abortive efforts to increase demand, resulting actually in driving customers away – this epitomizes “demarketing” and it is, by all means, “unintentional”. This chapter presents the developments in a sector where the consequences of such “unintentional demarketing” have often been overlooked. It highlights the “demarketing” consequences that were not envisaged by the HEI sector, which according to Levy, equates to “marketing myopia” arising from the unintentional demarketing initiatives by those institutions that should have known better. In their bid to embark upon ostensible demarketing (or sometimes strategic demarketing), HEIs have only ended up “cannibalizing” their flagship brands and/or services. Typical examples considered in this chapter include (i) the rampant revised editions of best-selling textbooks with very little value-added; (ii) polycentric misunderstanding of regionally adapted texts in order to appeal to erroneously perceived new frontiers (e.g. Asia and the Middle East); and (iii) the launch of inappropriate programmes and/or courses, which are little more than “a flash in the pan”with no sustainable basis for achieving medium-to long-term goals.

AB - There have been so many abortive efforts to increase demand, resulting actually in driving customers away – this epitomizes “demarketing” and it is, by all means, “unintentional”. This chapter presents the developments in a sector where the consequences of such “unintentional demarketing” have often been overlooked. It highlights the “demarketing” consequences that were not envisaged by the HEI sector, which according to Levy, equates to “marketing myopia” arising from the unintentional demarketing initiatives by those institutions that should have known better. In their bid to embark upon ostensible demarketing (or sometimes strategic demarketing), HEIs have only ended up “cannibalizing” their flagship brands and/or services. Typical examples considered in this chapter include (i) the rampant revised editions of best-selling textbooks with very little value-added; (ii) polycentric misunderstanding of regionally adapted texts in order to appeal to erroneously perceived new frontiers (e.g. Asia and the Middle East); and (iii) the launch of inappropriate programmes and/or courses, which are little more than “a flash in the pan”with no sustainable basis for achieving medium-to long-term goals.

U2 - 10.4324/9780203591208

DO - 10.4324/9780203591208

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84920378537

SN - 9780415816472

SN - 9780415816489

SP - 198

EP - 211

BT - Demarketing

A2 - Bradley, Nigel

A2 - Blythe, Jim

PB - Routledge

CY - Abingdon

ER -

Madichie NO. “Unintentional demarketing” in higher education. In Bradley N, Blythe J, editors, Demarketing. Abingdon: Routledge. 2013. p. 198-211 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203591208