Using the Ward Method as a structure for team-based analysis of complex case data

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to refine and further develop the Ward Method, a novel and innovative structure for group-decision-making by creative consensus.
Method: The application of this methodology in psychotherapy case study research is illustrated by analysis of transcript and other data from a case of brief pluralistic psychotherapy for a client experiencing sight loss.
Results: Ward analysis resulted in a group consensus on the outcome of the case, the therapeutic tasks undertaken by the client and counsellor, and other factors that contributed to outcome. Reflective accounts collected from members of the research team, on their experience of the Ward Method, are used to synthesise recommendations for the application of Ward methodology in further research.
Discussion: Validity and plausibility in psychotherapy case-study research is enhanced by the collection of rich case data, and the use of a group of researchers during data analysis. In practice, however, it can be difficult to organise the work of a case study research team in a manner that reflects effective use of time, while also ensuring a sufficient level of detailed analysis of case material. It can also be problematic to achieve authentic dialogue and consensus in a situation where there may be an imbalance in the power or perceived validity of the voices of different team members. This study illustrates the utility of the Ward Method in complex case-study analysis, in addressing these issues by maintaining a collaborative space and equality of voice during a structured, time-limited research process.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jun 2014
Event45th Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research: Facilitating Change: Learning from the Past, Looking to the Future - Copenhagen, Denmark
Duration: 25 Jun 201428 Jun 2014
Conference number: 45

Conference

Conference45th Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research
CountryDenmark
CityCopenhagen
Period25/06/1428/06/14

Fingerprint

psychotherapy
group decision
methodology
research process
counselor
equality
data analysis
Group
dialogue
decision making
experience
time

Cite this

Smith, K., Thurston, M., Eva, P., & McLeod, J. (2014). Using the Ward Method as a structure for team-based analysis of complex case data. Paper presented at 45th Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Smith, Kate ; Thurston, Mhairi ; Eva, Philemon ; McLeod, Julia. / Using the Ward Method as a structure for team-based analysis of complex case data. Paper presented at 45th Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.
@conference{c9e7e37c53b647e4ab264f58ca450e65,
title = "Using the Ward Method as a structure for team-based analysis of complex case data",
abstract = "Aim: The aim of this study was to refine and further develop the Ward Method, a novel and innovative structure for group-decision-making by creative consensus.Method: The application of this methodology in psychotherapy case study research is illustrated by analysis of transcript and other data from a case of brief pluralistic psychotherapy for a client experiencing sight loss.Results: Ward analysis resulted in a group consensus on the outcome of the case, the therapeutic tasks undertaken by the client and counsellor, and other factors that contributed to outcome. Reflective accounts collected from members of the research team, on their experience of the Ward Method, are used to synthesise recommendations for the application of Ward methodology in further research.Discussion: Validity and plausibility in psychotherapy case-study research is enhanced by the collection of rich case data, and the use of a group of researchers during data analysis. In practice, however, it can be difficult to organise the work of a case study research team in a manner that reflects effective use of time, while also ensuring a sufficient level of detailed analysis of case material. It can also be problematic to achieve authentic dialogue and consensus in a situation where there may be an imbalance in the power or perceived validity of the voices of different team members. This study illustrates the utility of the Ward Method in complex case-study analysis, in addressing these issues by maintaining a collaborative space and equality of voice during a structured, time-limited research process.",
author = "Kate Smith and Mhairi Thurston and Philemon Eva and Julia McLeod",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "27",
language = "English",
note = "45th Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research : Facilitating Change: Learning from the Past, Looking to the Future ; Conference date: 25-06-2014 Through 28-06-2014",

}

Smith, K, Thurston, M, Eva, P & McLeod, J 2014, 'Using the Ward Method as a structure for team-based analysis of complex case data' Paper presented at 45th Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Copenhagen, Denmark, 25/06/14 - 28/06/14, .

Using the Ward Method as a structure for team-based analysis of complex case data. / Smith, Kate; Thurston, Mhairi; Eva, Philemon; McLeod, Julia.

2014. Paper presented at 45th Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Using the Ward Method as a structure for team-based analysis of complex case data

AU - Smith, Kate

AU - Thurston, Mhairi

AU - Eva, Philemon

AU - McLeod, Julia

PY - 2014/6/27

Y1 - 2014/6/27

N2 - Aim: The aim of this study was to refine and further develop the Ward Method, a novel and innovative structure for group-decision-making by creative consensus.Method: The application of this methodology in psychotherapy case study research is illustrated by analysis of transcript and other data from a case of brief pluralistic psychotherapy for a client experiencing sight loss.Results: Ward analysis resulted in a group consensus on the outcome of the case, the therapeutic tasks undertaken by the client and counsellor, and other factors that contributed to outcome. Reflective accounts collected from members of the research team, on their experience of the Ward Method, are used to synthesise recommendations for the application of Ward methodology in further research.Discussion: Validity and plausibility in psychotherapy case-study research is enhanced by the collection of rich case data, and the use of a group of researchers during data analysis. In practice, however, it can be difficult to organise the work of a case study research team in a manner that reflects effective use of time, while also ensuring a sufficient level of detailed analysis of case material. It can also be problematic to achieve authentic dialogue and consensus in a situation where there may be an imbalance in the power or perceived validity of the voices of different team members. This study illustrates the utility of the Ward Method in complex case-study analysis, in addressing these issues by maintaining a collaborative space and equality of voice during a structured, time-limited research process.

AB - Aim: The aim of this study was to refine and further develop the Ward Method, a novel and innovative structure for group-decision-making by creative consensus.Method: The application of this methodology in psychotherapy case study research is illustrated by analysis of transcript and other data from a case of brief pluralistic psychotherapy for a client experiencing sight loss.Results: Ward analysis resulted in a group consensus on the outcome of the case, the therapeutic tasks undertaken by the client and counsellor, and other factors that contributed to outcome. Reflective accounts collected from members of the research team, on their experience of the Ward Method, are used to synthesise recommendations for the application of Ward methodology in further research.Discussion: Validity and plausibility in psychotherapy case-study research is enhanced by the collection of rich case data, and the use of a group of researchers during data analysis. In practice, however, it can be difficult to organise the work of a case study research team in a manner that reflects effective use of time, while also ensuring a sufficient level of detailed analysis of case material. It can also be problematic to achieve authentic dialogue and consensus in a situation where there may be an imbalance in the power or perceived validity of the voices of different team members. This study illustrates the utility of the Ward Method in complex case-study analysis, in addressing these issues by maintaining a collaborative space and equality of voice during a structured, time-limited research process.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Smith K, Thurston M, Eva P, McLeod J. Using the Ward Method as a structure for team-based analysis of complex case data. 2014. Paper presented at 45th Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.