What did I really vote for? On the usability of verifiable e-voting schemes

Karola Marky, Oksana Kulyk, Karen Renaud, Melanie Volkamer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)
80 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

E-voting has been embraced by a number of countries, delivering benefits in terms of efficiency and accessibility. End-to-end verifiable e-voting schemes facilitate verification of the integrity of individual votes during the election process. In particular, methods for cast-as-intended verification enable voters to confirm that their cast votes have not been manipulated by the voting client. A well-known technique for effecting cast-as-intended verification is the Benaloh Challenge. The usability of this challenge is crucial because voters have to be actively engaged in the verification process. In this paper, we report on a usability evaluation of three different approaches of the Benaloh Challenge in the remote e-voting context. We performed a comparative user study with 95 participants. We conclude with a recommendation for which approaches should be provided to afford verification in real-world elections and suggest usability improvements.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Number of pages13
ISBN (Print)9781450356206
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Apr 2018
EventCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Engage with CHI - Palais des Congrès de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
Duration: 21 Apr 201826 Apr 2018
https://chi2018.acm.org/

Conference

ConferenceCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Abbreviated titleCHI 2018
CountryCanada
CityMontreal
Period21/04/1826/04/18
Internet address

Cite this

Marky, K., Kulyk, O., Renaud, K., & Volkamer, M. (2018). What did I really vote for? On the usability of verifiable e-voting schemes. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems [176] New York: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173750
Marky, Karola ; Kulyk, Oksana ; Renaud, Karen ; Volkamer, Melanie. / What did I really vote for? On the usability of verifiable e-voting schemes. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York : Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2018.
@inproceedings{af75b30f2eac48ff92180866daf5726d,
title = "What did I really vote for? On the usability of verifiable e-voting schemes",
abstract = "E-voting has been embraced by a number of countries, delivering benefits in terms of efficiency and accessibility. End-to-end verifiable e-voting schemes facilitate verification of the integrity of individual votes during the election process. In particular, methods for cast-as-intended verification enable voters to confirm that their cast votes have not been manipulated by the voting client. A well-known technique for effecting cast-as-intended verification is the Benaloh Challenge. The usability of this challenge is crucial because voters have to be actively engaged in the verification process. In this paper, we report on a usability evaluation of three different approaches of the Benaloh Challenge in the remote e-voting context. We performed a comparative user study with 95 participants. We conclude with a recommendation for which approaches should be provided to afford verification in real-world elections and suggest usability improvements.",
author = "Karola Marky and Oksana Kulyk and Karen Renaud and Melanie Volkamer",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1145/3173574.3173750",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781450356206",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",
address = "United States",

}

Marky, K, Kulyk, O, Renaud, K & Volkamer, M 2018, What did I really vote for? On the usability of verifiable e-voting schemes. in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems., 176, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), New York, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada, 21/04/18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173750

What did I really vote for? On the usability of verifiable e-voting schemes. / Marky, Karola; Kulyk, Oksana; Renaud, Karen; Volkamer, Melanie.

Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York : Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2018. 176.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - What did I really vote for? On the usability of verifiable e-voting schemes

AU - Marky, Karola

AU - Kulyk, Oksana

AU - Renaud, Karen

AU - Volkamer, Melanie

PY - 2018/4/21

Y1 - 2018/4/21

N2 - E-voting has been embraced by a number of countries, delivering benefits in terms of efficiency and accessibility. End-to-end verifiable e-voting schemes facilitate verification of the integrity of individual votes during the election process. In particular, methods for cast-as-intended verification enable voters to confirm that their cast votes have not been manipulated by the voting client. A well-known technique for effecting cast-as-intended verification is the Benaloh Challenge. The usability of this challenge is crucial because voters have to be actively engaged in the verification process. In this paper, we report on a usability evaluation of three different approaches of the Benaloh Challenge in the remote e-voting context. We performed a comparative user study with 95 participants. We conclude with a recommendation for which approaches should be provided to afford verification in real-world elections and suggest usability improvements.

AB - E-voting has been embraced by a number of countries, delivering benefits in terms of efficiency and accessibility. End-to-end verifiable e-voting schemes facilitate verification of the integrity of individual votes during the election process. In particular, methods for cast-as-intended verification enable voters to confirm that their cast votes have not been manipulated by the voting client. A well-known technique for effecting cast-as-intended verification is the Benaloh Challenge. The usability of this challenge is crucial because voters have to be actively engaged in the verification process. In this paper, we report on a usability evaluation of three different approaches of the Benaloh Challenge in the remote e-voting context. We performed a comparative user study with 95 participants. We conclude with a recommendation for which approaches should be provided to afford verification in real-world elections and suggest usability improvements.

U2 - 10.1145/3173574.3173750

DO - 10.1145/3173574.3173750

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781450356206

BT - Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

PB - Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

CY - New York

ER -

Marky K, Kulyk O, Renaud K, Volkamer M. What did I really vote for? On the usability of verifiable e-voting schemes. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). 2018. 176 https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173750