When eyewitnesses talk

Daniel B. Wright, Amina Memon, Elin M. Skagerberg, Fiona Gabbert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 59 Citations

Abstract

When two people witness an event, they often discuss it. Because memory is not perfect, sometimes this discussion includes errors. One person's errors can become part of another person's account, and this proliferation of error can lead to miscarriages of justice. In this article, we describe the social and cognitive processes involved. Research shows how people combine information about their own memory with other people's memories based on factors such as confidence, perceived expertise, and the social cost of disagreeing with other people. We describe the implications of this research for eyewitness testimony.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)174-174
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent Directions in Psychological Science
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Spontaneous Abortion
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

Wright, D. B., Memon, A., Skagerberg, E. M., & Gabbert, F. (2009). When eyewitnesses talk. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 174-174. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01631.x

Wright, Daniel B.; Memon, Amina; Skagerberg, Elin M.; Gabbert, Fiona / When eyewitnesses talk.

In: Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 18, No. 3, 06.2009, p. 174-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{84eddd4d71134cb4ab5e36148853fc96,
title = "When eyewitnesses talk",
abstract = "When two people witness an event, they often discuss it. Because memory is not perfect, sometimes this discussion includes errors. One person's errors can become part of another person's account, and this proliferation of error can lead to miscarriages of justice. In this article, we describe the social and cognitive processes involved. Research shows how people combine information about their own memory with other people's memories based on factors such as confidence, perceived expertise, and the social cost of disagreeing with other people. We describe the implications of this research for eyewitness testimony.",
author = "Wright, {Daniel B.} and Amina Memon and Skagerberg, {Elin M.} and Fiona Gabbert",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01631.x",
volume = "18",
pages = "174--174",
journal = "Current Directions in Psychological Science",
issn = "0963-7214",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Wright, DB, Memon, A, Skagerberg, EM & Gabbert, F 2009, 'When eyewitnesses talk' Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol 18, no. 3, pp. 174-174. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01631.x

When eyewitnesses talk. / Wright, Daniel B.; Memon, Amina; Skagerberg, Elin M.; Gabbert, Fiona.

In: Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 18, No. 3, 06.2009, p. 174-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - When eyewitnesses talk

AU - Wright,Daniel B.

AU - Memon,Amina

AU - Skagerberg,Elin M.

AU - Gabbert,Fiona

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - When two people witness an event, they often discuss it. Because memory is not perfect, sometimes this discussion includes errors. One person's errors can become part of another person's account, and this proliferation of error can lead to miscarriages of justice. In this article, we describe the social and cognitive processes involved. Research shows how people combine information about their own memory with other people's memories based on factors such as confidence, perceived expertise, and the social cost of disagreeing with other people. We describe the implications of this research for eyewitness testimony.

AB - When two people witness an event, they often discuss it. Because memory is not perfect, sometimes this discussion includes errors. One person's errors can become part of another person's account, and this proliferation of error can lead to miscarriages of justice. In this article, we describe the social and cognitive processes involved. Research shows how people combine information about their own memory with other people's memories based on factors such as confidence, perceived expertise, and the social cost of disagreeing with other people. We describe the implications of this research for eyewitness testimony.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01631.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01631.x

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 174

EP - 174

JO - Current Directions in Psychological Science

T2 - Current Directions in Psychological Science

JF - Current Directions in Psychological Science

SN - 0963-7214

IS - 3

ER -

Wright DB, Memon A, Skagerberg EM, Gabbert F. When eyewitnesses talk. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2009 Jun;18(3):174-174. Available from, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01631.x