When eyewitnesses talk

Daniel B. Wright, Amina Memon, Elin M. Skagerberg, Fiona Gabbert

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    102 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    When two people witness an event, they often discuss it. Because memory is not perfect, sometimes this discussion includes errors. One person's errors can become part of another person's account, and this proliferation of error can lead to miscarriages of justice. In this article, we describe the social and cognitive processes involved. Research shows how people combine information about their own memory with other people's memories based on factors such as confidence, perceived expertise, and the social cost of disagreeing with other people. We describe the implications of this research for eyewitness testimony.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)174-174
    Number of pages5
    JournalCurrent Directions in Psychological Science
    Volume18
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

    Keywords

    • Memory conformity
    • Eyewitness testimony
    • Suggestibility

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'When eyewitnesses talk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this