Why free software is not the antonym of commercial software: two case studies from corporate to volunteer based projects

Stefano De Paoli; Vincenzo D'Andrea; Maurizio Teli

Why free software is not the antonym of commercial software: two case studies from corporate to volunteer based projects

Stefano De Paoli, Vincenzo D'Andrea, Maurizio Teli

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

29 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Academic literature often uses the terminology “commercial software” as an antonym of Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS). In this paper we challenge this opposition. Using an approach inspired by ethnomethodology, the paper illustrates how FLOSS developers, both volunteers and corporate employees, use the term “commercial software” as a constituent part of their discourses. We look closely at FLOSS discursive practices uncovering the interactional function of the term “free software” with the aim of provoking a reflection on how such terminology is used in FLOSS academic literature. In particular, we propose examples taken from two case studies: the Geographical Information System known as GRASS and the Operating System known as OpenSolaris.

Original language	English
Number of pages	19
Journal	Journal of Peer Production
Issue number	1
Publication status	Published - Jul 2012
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

DePaoli_WhyFreeSoftwareIsNot_Published_2012Final published version, 373 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-SA

http://peerproduction.net/editsuite/issues/issue-1/peer-reviewed-papers/why-free-software-is-not-the-antonym-of-commercial-software/Licence: CC BY-NC-SA

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Why free software is not the antonym of commercial software: two case studies from corporate to volunteer based projects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{7ad486197a784819829fb985013bd861,

title = "Why free software is not the antonym of commercial software: two case studies from corporate to volunteer based projects",

abstract = "Academic literature often uses the terminology “commercial software” as an antonym of Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS). In this paper we challenge this opposition. Using an approach inspired by ethnomethodology, the paper illustrates how FLOSS developers, both volunteers and corporate employees, use the term “commercial software” as a constituent part of their discourses. We look closely at FLOSS discursive practices uncovering the interactional function of the term “free software” with the aim of provoking a reflection on how such terminology is used in FLOSS academic literature. In particular, we propose examples taken from two case studies: the Geographical Information System known as GRASS and the Operating System known as OpenSolaris.",

author = "{De Paoli}, Stefano and Vincenzo D'Andrea and Maurizio Teli",

year = "2012",

month = jul,

language = "English",

journal = "Journal of Peer Production",

issn = "2213-5316",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why free software is not the antonym of commercial software

T2 - two case studies from corporate to volunteer based projects

AU - De Paoli, Stefano

AU - D'Andrea, Vincenzo

AU - Teli, Maurizio

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Academic literature often uses the terminology “commercial software” as an antonym of Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS). In this paper we challenge this opposition. Using an approach inspired by ethnomethodology, the paper illustrates how FLOSS developers, both volunteers and corporate employees, use the term “commercial software” as a constituent part of their discourses. We look closely at FLOSS discursive practices uncovering the interactional function of the term “free software” with the aim of provoking a reflection on how such terminology is used in FLOSS academic literature. In particular, we propose examples taken from two case studies: the Geographical Information System known as GRASS and the Operating System known as OpenSolaris.

AB - Academic literature often uses the terminology “commercial software” as an antonym of Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS). In this paper we challenge this opposition. Using an approach inspired by ethnomethodology, the paper illustrates how FLOSS developers, both volunteers and corporate employees, use the term “commercial software” as a constituent part of their discourses. We look closely at FLOSS discursive practices uncovering the interactional function of the term “free software” with the aim of provoking a reflection on how such terminology is used in FLOSS academic literature. In particular, we propose examples taken from two case studies: the Geographical Information System known as GRASS and the Operating System known as OpenSolaris.

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Peer Production

JF - Journal of Peer Production

SN - 2213-5316

IS - 1

ER -