‘You are what you research’: researcher partisanship and the sociology of the ‘underdog’

Karen Lumsden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article contributes to debates regarding the issue of researcher partisanship and bias within social research and situates it within the current trend towards reflexivity. The discussion draws upon the researcher’s experiences of conducting fieldwork with the ‘boy racer’ culture and societal groups affected by their behaviour. In this instance, the researcher unintentionally sided with the ‘underdogs’ – the ‘boy racers’. Hence, it is argued that value neutrality is an impossible goal, particularly in research of a political nature. Social researchers will inevitably ‘take sides’ whether or not they are willing to admit so. The discussion also touches upon the prevalence of media culture in ethnographic research and the dilemmas faced when making our research public at key moments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-18
Number of pages16
JournalQualitative Research
Volume13
Issue number1
Early online date15 Jun 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2013

Fingerprint

sociology
media culture
neutrality
reflexivity
trend
social research
Values
experience
Group

Cite this

@article{aa05d32aace54f489f0e3785215ca121,
title = "‘You are what you research’: researcher partisanship and the sociology of the ‘underdog’",
abstract = "This article contributes to debates regarding the issue of researcher partisanship and bias within social research and situates it within the current trend towards reflexivity. The discussion draws upon the researcher’s experiences of conducting fieldwork with the ‘boy racer’ culture and societal groups affected by their behaviour. In this instance, the researcher unintentionally sided with the ‘underdogs’ – the ‘boy racers’. Hence, it is argued that value neutrality is an impossible goal, particularly in research of a political nature. Social researchers will inevitably ‘take sides’ whether or not they are willing to admit so. The discussion also touches upon the prevalence of media culture in ethnographic research and the dilemmas faced when making our research public at key moments.",
author = "Karen Lumsden",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1468794112439012",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "3--18",
journal = "Qualitative Research",
issn = "1741-3109",
number = "1",

}

‘You are what you research’ : researcher partisanship and the sociology of the ‘underdog’. / Lumsden, Karen.

In: Qualitative Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.02.2013, p. 3-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘You are what you research’

T2 - researcher partisanship and the sociology of the ‘underdog’

AU - Lumsden, Karen

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - This article contributes to debates regarding the issue of researcher partisanship and bias within social research and situates it within the current trend towards reflexivity. The discussion draws upon the researcher’s experiences of conducting fieldwork with the ‘boy racer’ culture and societal groups affected by their behaviour. In this instance, the researcher unintentionally sided with the ‘underdogs’ – the ‘boy racers’. Hence, it is argued that value neutrality is an impossible goal, particularly in research of a political nature. Social researchers will inevitably ‘take sides’ whether or not they are willing to admit so. The discussion also touches upon the prevalence of media culture in ethnographic research and the dilemmas faced when making our research public at key moments.

AB - This article contributes to debates regarding the issue of researcher partisanship and bias within social research and situates it within the current trend towards reflexivity. The discussion draws upon the researcher’s experiences of conducting fieldwork with the ‘boy racer’ culture and societal groups affected by their behaviour. In this instance, the researcher unintentionally sided with the ‘underdogs’ – the ‘boy racers’. Hence, it is argued that value neutrality is an impossible goal, particularly in research of a political nature. Social researchers will inevitably ‘take sides’ whether or not they are willing to admit so. The discussion also touches upon the prevalence of media culture in ethnographic research and the dilemmas faced when making our research public at key moments.

U2 - 10.1177/1468794112439012

DO - 10.1177/1468794112439012

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 3

EP - 18

JO - Qualitative Research

JF - Qualitative Research

SN - 1741-3109

IS - 1

ER -