Zoo visitors’ understanding of terms denoting research activity

Lloyd Carson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Zoos have increasingly sought to justify their existence by reference to a scientific role particularly in the domains of animal welfare and conservation. Given recent initiatives by the UK government to foster public engagement with science, it is timely to investigate public attitudes towards primary research activity by zoos. This study reports the views of 83 visitors to Edinburgh Zoo. Within certain items in a structured interview noun terms denoting research activity were manipulated (“research” versus “studies”) as was their qualification (adjective “scientific” present or absent before the noun term). “Research” was associated with a restricted and negative perception of investigatory activity. This effect was intensified when the noun term was preceded by “scientific”. It is concluded that there is a continuing need to challenge public perceptions, particularly of the phrase “scientific research”; that in the meantime zoos should perhaps exercise caution when using it in relation to their activities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)547-556
Number of pages10
JournalPublic Understanding of Science
Volume23
Issue number5
Early online date10 Sep 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2014

Fingerprint

qualification
conservation
animal
welfare
present
interview
science

Cite this

@article{76d670dfccfc416ba032fff0901630d6,
title = "Zoo visitors’ understanding of terms denoting research activity",
abstract = "Zoos have increasingly sought to justify their existence by reference to a scientific role particularly in the domains of animal welfare and conservation. Given recent initiatives by the UK government to foster public engagement with science, it is timely to investigate public attitudes towards primary research activity by zoos. This study reports the views of 83 visitors to Edinburgh Zoo. Within certain items in a structured interview noun terms denoting research activity were manipulated (“research” versus “studies”) as was their qualification (adjective “scientific” present or absent before the noun term). “Research” was associated with a restricted and negative perception of investigatory activity. This effect was intensified when the noun term was preceded by “scientific”. It is concluded that there is a continuing need to challenge public perceptions, particularly of the phrase “scientific research”; that in the meantime zoos should perhaps exercise caution when using it in relation to their activities.",
author = "Lloyd Carson",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0963662512456128",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "547--556",
journal = "Public Understanding of Science",
issn = "0963-6625",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Zoo visitors’ understanding of terms denoting research activity. / Carson, Lloyd.

In: Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 23, No. 5, 01.07.2014, p. 547-556.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Zoo visitors’ understanding of terms denoting research activity

AU - Carson, Lloyd

PY - 2014/7/1

Y1 - 2014/7/1

N2 - Zoos have increasingly sought to justify their existence by reference to a scientific role particularly in the domains of animal welfare and conservation. Given recent initiatives by the UK government to foster public engagement with science, it is timely to investigate public attitudes towards primary research activity by zoos. This study reports the views of 83 visitors to Edinburgh Zoo. Within certain items in a structured interview noun terms denoting research activity were manipulated (“research” versus “studies”) as was their qualification (adjective “scientific” present or absent before the noun term). “Research” was associated with a restricted and negative perception of investigatory activity. This effect was intensified when the noun term was preceded by “scientific”. It is concluded that there is a continuing need to challenge public perceptions, particularly of the phrase “scientific research”; that in the meantime zoos should perhaps exercise caution when using it in relation to their activities.

AB - Zoos have increasingly sought to justify their existence by reference to a scientific role particularly in the domains of animal welfare and conservation. Given recent initiatives by the UK government to foster public engagement with science, it is timely to investigate public attitudes towards primary research activity by zoos. This study reports the views of 83 visitors to Edinburgh Zoo. Within certain items in a structured interview noun terms denoting research activity were manipulated (“research” versus “studies”) as was their qualification (adjective “scientific” present or absent before the noun term). “Research” was associated with a restricted and negative perception of investigatory activity. This effect was intensified when the noun term was preceded by “scientific”. It is concluded that there is a continuing need to challenge public perceptions, particularly of the phrase “scientific research”; that in the meantime zoos should perhaps exercise caution when using it in relation to their activities.

U2 - 10.1177/0963662512456128

DO - 10.1177/0963662512456128

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 547

EP - 556

JO - Public Understanding of Science

JF - Public Understanding of Science

SN - 0963-6625

IS - 5

ER -